One might think that it is a tragedy that the head of the IMF, Dominique Strauss-Kahn, succumbed to his vice, the obsessive search for perverse sex. Running naked after a Black maid in suite 2806 of the Sofitel Hotel in New York City, he grabbed and forced her to have sex. The details were thoroughly described by the New York District Attorney. For the sake of decency, I will not repeat them. It was not a tragedy for him: it was just one more person in this world whom he has victimized. Afterwards, he got dressed, and went directly to the airport. What is funny is that he left his cell phone in the hotel suite, and because of that, the police were able to detain him, after he had already boarded the plane.
The tragedy was not what happened to him, but to the victim, which no-one wants to know. Her name is Nifissatou Diallo, an African, Moslem, from Guinea, a widow and mother of a 15 year old daughter. The police found her hiding behind a cupboard, crying and vomiting, traumatized by the violence suffered at the hands of the hotel guest, whose name she did not even know.
Most of the French media, cynically and openly machista, tried to hide the facts, claiming even possible entrapment of the future socialist candidate for President of the French Republic. The former Minister of Culture and Education, Jacques Lang, from whom we could have expected some esprit de finesse, said contemptuously: «in the end, no one died.» It was not important that a woman was psychologically devastated by Mr. Strauss-Kahn’s brutality. For them, she is just a woman, an African woman. Could it be that in their backward mentality, a woman is good only to be a mere «object of bed and table»?
In fairness, we have to see the facts through the eyes of the victim. Only then can we capture the dimensions of her suffering, and the humiliation of so many other women in the world who have been kidnapped, raped, and sold as sex slaves. Only a society that has lost all sense of dignity, that has been brutalized by the prevalence of a materialist conception of life, that turns everything into objects and merchandise, could make such an offense possible.
Everything today has become merchandise, and an opportunity to make money; from privatizing the goods common to humanity, (such as water, earth, seeds), to prostituting children and women. Even human organs are marketed. If Marx saw all this, he would certainly be scandalized, because to him capitalism lived on the exploitation of the work force, but not from selling lives. Nonetheless, already in 1847, in the Misery of Philosophy, he wrote: «Recently, we have arrived at a point where everything that men had considered inalienable has been turned into objects of exchange, commercialized, and subject to sale. Things have become commercialized that previously were communicated, but never exchanged; given, but never sold; acquired, but never bought, things such as virtue, love, opinion, science and consciousness. A time of general corruption and of universal venality reigns … when everything is taken to the market.»
Strauss-Kahn is a metaphor for the present neoliberal system. It sucks the blood of countries in crisis, such as Iceland, Ireland, Greece, Portugal, and now Spain, as was previously done with Brazil and the countries of Latin America and of Asia. To save the banks and enable repayment of debts, it devastated societies, forced workers out of their jobs, privatized public goods, cut salaries, delayed retirement ages, mandated longer work hours. All because of capital. The enforcer of these world policies is, among others, the IMF, of which Strauss-Kahn was the central figure.
What he did to Nafissatou Diallo is a metaphor for what he was doing to the countries in financial difficulties. He deserves jail not just for the sexual violence against the hotel maid, but even more, for the economic rape of the people, that he committed from the IMF. We are desolate.
La Avaricia de algunos terrícolas no tiene límites. No entiendo que no vean que están explotando a otras personas. No entiendo que no tengan remordimientos por ello. ¿Por qué les consentimos que sean así ? ¿ Por qué no les paramos ya ? Hay que abrirles los ojos y decirles que no somos imbéciles, que si han vivido así es porque se lo hemos consentido los demás, pero que podemos cansarnos y juzgarlos, encerrarlos, etc… Están jugando con fuego y un día se van a quemar. Les haríamos un favor si les quitáramos la posibilidad de que se quemen….
Saludos,
You may be right, and I certainly agree with your analysis of the role of the IMF in”rescuing” economies by the means of impoverishing the people.
But it is still wrong to suggest that “the details [as] thoroughly described by the New York District Attorney” relieve us of the inconvenience of awaiting the outcome of the trial. Even when you disdain the accused, deciding a man’s guilt on the say-so of a prosecutor is not justice. Just as summary execution is not justice: http://billynojob.wordpress.com/2011/05/18/obl-and-dsk-fame-infamy-and-due-process/
1 This is what the Sovereign LORD showed me: a basket of ripe fruit. 2 “What do you see, Amos?” he asked.
“A basket of ripe fruit,” I answered.
Then the LORD said to me, “The time is ripe for my people Israel; I will spare them no longer.
3 “In that day,” declares the Sovereign LORD, “the songs in the temple will turn to wailing.[a] Many, many bodies—flung everywhere! Silence!”
4 Hear this, you who trample the needy
and do away with the poor of the land,
5 saying,
“When will the New Moon be over
that we may sell grain,
and the Sabbath be ended
that we may market wheat?”—
skimping on the measure,
boosting the price
and cheating with dishonest scales,
6 buying the poor with silver
and the needy for a pair of sandals,
selling even the sweepings with the wheat.
Oh… My Lord.. How long we need to wait for your justice?
Why are so silent?
Have mercy on us…
Deliver us form these rapists.
Strengthen us not suffer but bring your kingdom and it’s righteousness.
While I would be /on the same side’ as the author in a lot of his beliefs and would share their sore values, it is not journalism to state allegations as facts. Period.
The Presumption of Innocence until proven guilty is also a basic human right. An important one. Do we want to go back to the Lynch Mobs? I don’t. Two wrongs don’t make a right. Give him an appropriate sentence WHEN and IF he is proven guilty. Which might be to serve those he has offended against. Or to give his time in service of his fellow human beings in another way. I disagree with Punishment, per se, for many reasons, not the least of which is, it actually doesn’t work.
And he was fair in his dealings with Ireland, unlike the treatment being meted out right now by our bullying ‘friends’ in Europe.